Project Management Software for Civil & Infrastructure Contractors in India
Multi-site execution, BOQ versioning, sub-contractor reliability scoring, and the receivables discipline that ₹50-500 Cr civil shops actually need.
Free Starter tier — no credit card
All figures are industry-typical / modelled from publicly observable EPC data, not measured KaptIQ customer outcomes. KaptIQ is pre-revenue at launch — see homepage for current status.
What breaks today
The five recurring pain patterns that drive project management software for civil & infrastructure contractors in india projects into RA disputes, BG penalties, and capital lockup.
- ● Multi-site execution: 5-12 active sites, one MIS team, no consolidated view — Excel becomes the bottleneck
- ● BOQ versioning: amendment after amendment, but RA bills get raised against the wrong version, triggering 60-day disputes
- ● Sub-contractor reliability is tracked by gut feel. The same vendor who delays Project A is awarded Project B because nobody scored it
- ● Multi-tier client structures (PMC, EPC, sub-EPC) each have their own RA submission format — your Commercial team rebuilds the same Excel five times a month
- ● Capital is locked in 90+ day receivables across multiple government and PMC clients with no consolidated DSO view
How KaptIQ is built for this
Vertical-specific milestone templates, RA reconciliation logic, and stagnation flags — not a generic PM tool retrofitted with a new logo.
Multi-site portfolio control tower
One CEO dashboard ranks your 5-12 active sites by health score. Action Queue surfaces what to act on today. No more weekly review meetings where the bottom 3 projects get 80% of the airtime.
BOQ versioning across amendments
Each BOQ amendment is a versioned event. RA bills are computed against the version active on certification date. When a client disputes a claim 60 days later, the version trail is one export.
Sub-contractor reliability scoring
KaptIQ's contractor scorecards rank sub-contractors on delay rate, average delay duration, and milestone value handled. Award decisions stop being relationship-driven and start being data-driven.
Multi-tier RA submission formats
Submit RA in PMC format, EPC format, or sub-EPC format from the same source data. Your Commercial team builds it once; KaptIQ reformats per client.
Related KaptIQ capabilities
Common questions
From founders, Director-Projects, Commercial Managers, and CFOs we have spoken to during the Founding 25 cohort design phase.
Can KaptIQ handle 12 concurrent sites?
Yes. The portfolio control tower is built for 5-50 active projects. Health score, Action Queue, and risk table scale to that range without UI degradation.
Does the system track BOQ amendments?
Yes. Amendments are versioned events with effective-from dates. RA bills are computed against the version active at milestone certification, not the latest amendment.
How does sub-contractor scoring work?
Each sub-contractor's milestones are scored on on-time delivery, average delay duration, and milestone value handled. The scorecard ranks them weighted, so award decisions are data-driven.
Can we submit RA in PMC, EPC, and sub-EPC formats?
Yes. RA exports are templated per client. Build the source data once; export to whichever format the client mandates.
Does the receivables ageing handle government clients?
Yes. Government clients with 120-180 day cycles are tracked the same way as private. The weighted DSO calculation accounts for value-weighted ageing, not just oldest-first.
Can we run KaptIQ across 3 group companies?
Yes. Multi-company consolidation is a Growth/Enterprise tier feature — group CEO sees consolidated portfolio across sister concerns; site teams see only their entity.
Ready to stop losing capital to RA disputes and BG penalties?
Start free. Add your first 3 projects. See your Action Queue tomorrow morning.
Also relevant for: